Still Outsourcing Every DA? Why Town Planning Software Is Catching On

For years, most development applications have been handed over to external planners and managed largely out of sight. On routine applications, this can introduce delays and costs that feel out of proportion to the planning risk involved. Platforms like Planna are changing this by keeping planner review in place while giving project teams more visibility, faster turnaround, and better control over the process.
Where the traditional DA workflow starts to fall behind
Most delays on low risk development applications do not come from design quality or controversial planning outcomes. They come from process.
Reports that take weeks to commence. Planning controls that are not clearly addressed until council assessment. Requests for further information that could have been avoided if the planning response had been structured properly from the outset.
Outsourcing remains appropriate for complex sites, sensitive locations, or projects that require strategic planning input. But when the same approach is applied to every DA, including routine residential and small commercial work, inefficiencies begin to surface.
The issue is not the planner. It is the workflow around them.
What town planning software actually helps with
There is a lot of loose language around town planning platforms and AI planning reports, which can make it difficult to understand where the real value sits.
Effective town planning software does not attempt to replace professional judgement. It supports it by handling the repetitive and time consuming aspects of the process with greater consistency.
In practice, this means identifying zoning and overlays early, structuring planning responses clearly, and producing reports that align with how councils assess applications. A planning report generator is useful when it ensures basic issues are addressed upfront and when the documentation is clear and logical for an assessing officer to work through.
The value is not automation itself, but reducing the issues that usually emerge further down the line.
Why low risk projects are where this matters most
Low risk projects are often where planning effort is compressed. Because the proposal appears straightforward, the planning work can be treated as secondary.
That is where delays tend to occur.
A simple residential application that should move quickly can stall because an overlay was not addressed properly or because the planning justification did not clearly respond to local policy. These are not complex planning problems, but they still trigger formal requests for further information.
Town planning software helps bring structure to these projects early. It prompts the right questions upfront and helps ensure the planning response aligns with the relevant controls from the beginning.
This is where Planna is particularly effective.
How Planna is being used in practice
Planna is not positioned as a replacement for planners. It is a planning platform designed to support everyday development application work, particularly where the planning pathway is relatively clear.
Teams use Planna to carry out early checks, prepare planning reports, and understand site constraints before lodging an application. Reports are generated using structured planning logic and reviewed by qualified planners prior to finalisation.
That review step matters. It ensures the documentation reflects professional standards rather than generic AI output, and it helps reports stand up during council assessment.
For low risk projects, this often removes the need for extended back and forth altogether.
Faster checks without lowering the bar
Speed in planning is often misunderstood. Faster does not mean rushed. It means issues are identified earlier.
When zoning provisions, overlays, and relevant policy are clearly addressed from the outset, the assessment process is more likely to progress smoothly. Councils are less inclined to pause applications for clarification and can focus on the merits of the proposal.
Using a development application software platform like Planna allows this work to occur in days rather than weeks. This is particularly valuable when managing multiple projects or working within tight client timeframes.
It also reduces the pressure that comes from trying to retrofit planning input late in the design process.
Affordability and proportionality
One of the challenges with traditional planning workflows is cost proportionality. Full consultant fees can be difficult to justify for smaller or repeat projects, which can lead to planning work being under scoped or delayed.
Planna provides a more affordable way to prepare professional planning documentation for low risk work while maintaining review and compliance. This makes it easier to apply consistent planning discipline across all projects, not only the complex ones.
From a business perspective, it also allows teams to manage planning work with greater control rather than treating it as a fixed external cost.
Why town planning platforms are becoming standard
Planning systems are becoming more structured. Councils increasingly expect clearer documentation and stronger upfront justification. Informal processes and reactive fixes are becoming less effective.
Town planning software supports this shift by helping teams prepare better applications from the outset. It does not remove the need for planning expertise. It allows that expertise to be applied more efficiently.
Planna fits within this space because it reflects how planners actually work. It supports decision making rather than attempting to automate it.
The takeaway
Outsourcing will always have a place, particularly for complex or sensitive projects. But for low risk development applications, it no longer needs to be the default.
Town planning software gives planners and project teams greater control over timeframes, cost, and quality. Used well, it improves outcomes rather than diluting them.
That is why more teams are reassessing how they manage development applications and why platforms like Planna are gaining traction.
